<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digging For Answers Without A Shovel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/</link>
	<description>Unwrapping the Mysteries of Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delia</title>
		<link>http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hi, Heather! 

I think it&#039;s great that you are out digging for answers! -- that’s what journalists are *supposed* to do...(and you certainly appear to have the credentials)

I would just suggest that you set aside what Craig (or any other interviewee) says and really look into those things... 

e.g. &quot;According to Craig in the interview, the community doesn’t care about fancy graphics or features, they just want it to do what it does&quot; --&gt; I&#039;d look into this... feedback forum -- it has a search function --is a good place to start: what has the community asked for and for how long? (more than a rudimentary search function is one of the obvious candidates)

Delia

P.S. good luck with everything and take care! D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Heather! </p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s great that you are out digging for answers! &#8212; that’s what journalists are *supposed* to do&#8230;(and you certainly appear to have the credentials)</p>
<p>I would just suggest that you set aside what Craig (or any other interviewee) says and really look into those things&#8230; </p>
<p>e.g. &#8220;According to Craig in the interview, the community doesn’t care about fancy graphics or features, they just want it to do what it does&#8221; &#8211;&gt; I&#8217;d look into this&#8230; feedback forum &#8212; it has a search function &#8211;is a good place to start: what has the community asked for and for how long? (more than a rudimentary search function is one of the obvious candidates)</p>
<p>Delia</p>
<p>P.S. good luck with everything and take care! D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Newmark</title>
		<link>http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Newmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heathervale.com/blog/2007/10/30/digging-for-answers-without-a-shovel/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hey, just call or email for me, and enjoy the new goats!

(check out cnewmark.com)

Craig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just call or email for me, and enjoy the new goats!</p>
<p>(check out cnewmark.com)</p>
<p>Craig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

